DUS characterization of indigenous and exotic soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] germplasm in North Western Himalayas

Authors

  • Ronika Thakur Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh
  • Vedna Kumari Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh
  • Jyoti Kumari Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh
  • Diksha Khajuria Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh
  • Aradhana Kumari Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh
  • Rishita Kapoor Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh

Keywords:

DUS, genetic resources, germplasm, Soybean

Abstract

Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) characterization plays a crucial role in ensuring accurate identification and differentiation of plant varieties and genotypes. In the present study, 320 indigenous and exotic soybean accessions were morphologically characterized using 20 DUS descriptors during kharif, 2022. The characters viz., flower color, anthocyanin pigmentation, pod pubescence, and growth habit were identified as prominent for identification of a variety. Principal component analysis revealed that the initial two components explained 24.47% of the overall multi variate variation. Cluster analysis identified four distinct clusters with 16, 14, 267, and 23 genotypes, signifying substantial diversity within the germplasm. This knowledge of frequency distribution analysis under the framework of DUS characterization will guide researchers in taking decisions, ensuring varietal stability and upholding the integrity of plant variety protection systems along with facilitating the characterization, preservation and utilization of beneficial genes in the germplasm for soybean improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

How to Cite

Thakur, R., Kumari, V., Kumari, J., Khajuria, D., Kumari, A., & Kapoor, R. (2024). DUS characterization of indigenous and exotic soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merrill] germplasm in North Western Himalayas. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 50(2), 190–200. Retrieved from http://hjar.org/index.php/hjar/article/view/172588

References

Abdelghany AM, Zhang S, Azam M, Shaibu AS, Feng Y, Qi J, Li J, Li Y, Tian Y, Hong H and Lamlom SF 2021. Exploring the phenotypic stability of soybean seed compositions using multi-trait stability index approach. Agronomy11 (11): 2200.

Anonymous 2018. National Mission on Oilseeds and Oil Pa lm https://www.nfsm.gov.in/StatusPaper/NMOOP2018.pdf.

Asati R, Tripathi MK, Yadav RK, Tiwari S, Chauhan S, Tripathi N, Solanki RS and Yasin M 2023. Morphological description of chickpea (Cicer arietanum L) genotypes using DUS characterization. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 13 (9):1321-1341.

Ashinie SK, Tesfaye B, Wakeyo GK and Fenta BA 2020. Genetic diversity for immature pod traits in Ethiopian cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] landrace collections. African Journal of Biotechnology 19 (4): 171-182.

Buezo J, Sanz Saez Á, Moran JF, Soba D, Aranjuelo I and Esteban R 2019. Drought tolerance response of high yielding soybean varieties to mild drought: physiological and photochemical adjustments. Physiologia Plantarum 166 (1): 88-104.

Chahal GS and Gosal SS 2002. Principles and procedures of plant breeding: biotechnological and conventional approaches. Alpha Science International, UK.

Gijzen M, Weng C, Kuflu K, Woodrow L, Yu K and Poysa V 2003. Soybean seed lustre phenotype and surface protein cosegregate and map to linkage group E. Genome 46 (4): 659-664.

Kaiser HF 1961. A note on Guttman’s lower bound for the number of common factors. British Journal of Statistical Psychology.

Li M, Liu Y, Wang C, Yang X, Li D, Zhang X, Xu C, Zhang Y, Li W and Zhao L 2020. Identification of traits contributing to high and stable yields in different soybean varieties across three Chinese latitudes. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1642.

Li Q, Fu Q, Li T, Liu D, Hou R, Li M and Gao Y 2022. Biochar impacts on the soil environment of soybean root systems. Science of the Total Environment 821: 153421.

Pachori S, Tiwari S, Shrivastava MK, Amrate PK, Thakur S and Gupta S 2023. Unveiling genetic diversity in soybean germplasm: A comprehensive analysis through DUS characteristics. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 14 (4): 1541-1547.

Rana N, Sharma A, Rana RS, Lata H, Bansuli, Thakur A, Singh V and Sood A 2023. Morphological and molecular diversity in mid-late and late maturity genotypes of cauliflower. PLoS ONE 18 (8): e0290495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0290495

Sekhon BS and Sharma A 2019. Genetic Studies based on Selected Morpho–physiological Parameters in Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 32 (1): 59-65.

Sekhon BS, Sharma A, Katoch V, Kapila RK and Sood VK 2019. Assessment of genetic diversity in advanced breeding lines derived from intraspecific crosses of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research 42 (2): 145-152.

Sharma A, Bhardwaj A, Katoch V and Sharma JD 2013. Assessment of genetic diversity of garden pea (Pisum sativum) as perspective to isolate horticulturally desirable transgressive segregants. Indian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 83 (12): 1334-39.

Singh S, Kapila RK, Kanwar R and Dhiman KC 2021. Characterisation of soybean varieties of Himachal Pradesh using morphometric descriptors. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 47 (1): 50-60.

Singh V, Sood VK, Sood R, Sharma S and Katna G 2024. Genetic diversity of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) genotypes based on cluster and principal component analyses in Organic Agriculture. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 50 (1): 29-37.

Sivabharathi RC, Muthuswamy A, Anandhi K and Karthiba L 2022. Characterization of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] genotypes using DUS descriptors. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 13 (2): 455-464.

Soharu A, Mittal RK, Sood VK and Kaur N 2022. Morphological characterization and evaluation of Himalayan landraces of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) from Northwestern plain zone for yield and its component traits. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48 (2): 157-165.

Song J, Liu Z, Hong H, Ma Y, Tian L, Li X, Li YH, Guan R, Guo Y and Qiu LJ 2016. Identification and validation of loci governing seed coat color by combining association mapping and bulk segregation analysis in soy bean. PLoS One 11 (7): e0159064.

Tripathi N, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S and Payasi DK 2022. Molecular breeding to overcome biotic stresses in soybean: update. Plants 11 (15): 1967-1978.

Yan X, Zhao H, Liu X, Li Q, Wang Y, Yuan C and Dong Y 2014. Phenotypic traits and diversity of different leaf shape accessions of the wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) in China. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 94 (2): 397-404.

Zhang H, Goettel W, Song Q, Jiang H, Hu Z, Wang ML and An YQ 2020. Selection of GmSWEET39 for oil and protein improvement in soybean. PLoS Genetics 16 (11): e1009114.

Zhao Q, Shi X, Yan L, Yang C, Liu C, Feng Y, Zhang M, Yang Yand Liao H 2021. Characterization of the common genetic basis underlying seed hilum size, yield, and quality traits in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 610214.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.