Impact of Foliar Application of Bio Nano P and K and their Conventional Sources on Yield of Maize and Wheat in an Acid Alfisol

Authors

  • Devanshi Baghla Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • V.K. Sharma Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062

Keywords:

Maize, Wheat, Bio Nano P, Bio Nano K, Natural Farming, Yield, Alfisol.

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of bio-nano P and K fertilizer solutions in optimizing respective nutrient requirement in maize-wheat sequence, a field experiment was conducted in an acid Alfisol during 2019-20 at the experimental farm of CSKHPKV, Palampur in a randomized block design comprising fourteen treatments. Specifically, the experiment aimed at evaluating the efficacy of two foliar applications of bio nano P and K (one 30-35 days after germination of crop and second 20-25 days after first spray) in comparison to their conventional sources at 0, 50 and 100 per cent RDF levels of P and K individually and also in combination with 50 and 100 per cent RDF levels of P& K on productivity in maize and wheat crops. Highest grain (52.9 and 33.4 q-1 ha-1) and stover/straw yield (82.1 and 49.4 q-1 ha-1) of maize and wheat, respectively, were observed with treatment where 100 per cent RDF was applied through conventional sources along with two foliar applications of bio nano P and K (T13) whereas lowest grain (19.6 and 16.6 q-1 ha-1) and stover/ straw yield (30.0 13 and 28.1 q-1 ha-1) was observed with natural farming treatment (T14). The treatments P50 (T2) and P0 + BN-P(T4), P100 (T3) and P50 + BN-P(T5) in case of P and K50 (T8) and K0 + BN-K (T9) and K100 (T 3) and K50 +BN-K (T10) were statistically at par with each other. Similarly, treatments P100 K100 (T3) and P50 K50 + BN-P & K (T12) showed statistical similarity, highlighting the effectiveness of foliar bio nano application in optimizing crop nutrient requirement to the extent of 50 per cent of the RDF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Baghla, D., & Sharma, V. (2023). Impact of Foliar Application of Bio Nano P and K and their Conventional Sources on Yield of Maize and Wheat in an Acid <i>Alfisol</i>. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 49(1), 55–61. Retrieved from http://hjar.org/index.php/hjar/article/view/172435

Issue

Section

Research Paper

References

Abbasi M, Tahir M and Rahim N. 2013. Effect of N fertilizer source and timing on yield and N use efficiency of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) in Kashmir- Pakistan. Geoderma 195:87-93.

Abdel-Aziz HMM, Mohammed NAH and Aya MO. 2018. Effect of foliar application of nano chitosan NPK fertilizer on the chemical composition of wheat grains. Egytian Journal of Botany 58: 87-95.

Abyaneh HA and Maryam B. 2014.The effect of nanofertilizers on nitrate leaching and its distribution in soil profile with an emphasis on potato yield. Nano Science and NanoTechnology ISSN: 0974-7494.

Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z and Seed NA. 2017. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: An unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 26983-26987.

Anonymous. 2019. Statistical Yearbook of Himachal Pradesh 2018-19. Department of Economics and Statistics Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.

Anonymous. 2020. Agricultural Statistics at a glance-2020. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation and Farmer Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.

Arif NV, Yadav S, Singh RK, Mishra S, Sharma NK, Dubey DK, Tripathi and Chauhan DK. 2016. Current trend of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in sustainable agriculture- An Overview. Journal of Environmental Analytical Toxicology 6:1-5.

Ayub M, Nadeem MA, Sharar MS and Mahmood N. 2002. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1: 352-354.

Casey J. 2020. Indian Fertilizer Under Pressure. World Fertilizer Magazine.

Chen ML, Jiang XL, Zoov BY and Zheri ZY. 1994. Mathematical models and best combination of high yield cultivation technique for rapeseed variety Zhenyouyoum. Acta Agric Zhejiiangenesis 6:22-26.

Cong WF, Suriyagoda LDB and Lambers H. 2020. Tightening the phosphorus cycle through phosphorusefficient crop genotypes. Trends Plant Science 25:967–75.

De Rosa MC, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh R and Sultan Y. 2010. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. National Nanotechnology 5: 91.

Drostkar ER, Talebi and Kanouni H. 2016. Foliar application of Fe, Zn and NPK nano- fertilizers on seed yield and morphological traits in chickpea under rainfed condition. Journal of Research and Ecology 4:221-228.

Ekinci M, Dursun A, Yildirim E and Karagoz FP. 2014. Effect of nanotechnology liquid fertilizers on plant growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). ActaScientiarumPolonorum, Hortirum Cultus 13(3): 135-141.

Fatima F,HashimA and Anees S. 2021. Efficacy of nanoparticles as nanofertilizer production: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:1292–1303.

Kogbe JOS and Adediran JA. 2003. Influence of N, Pand K application on yield of maize in Savana Zone of Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 2(10): 345-349.

Liu R and Lal R. 2014. Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Scientific Reports 4: 1-6.

Marzouk NM, Abd-Alrahman HA, Tanahy EL and Mohmouud SH. 2019. Impact of foliar spraying of nano micronutrient fertilizers on the growth, yield, physical quality, and nutritional value of two snap bean cultivars in sandy soils. Bulletin of the National Research Centre 43:84.

Meena RH, Jat G and Jain D. 2020. Impact of foliar application of different nano-fertilizers on soil microbial properties and yield of wheat. Journal of Environmental Biology 42: 302- 308.

Meena S, Gautam C, Patidar P, Meena M, Prakasha G and Vishwajith G. 2017. Nano fertilizers is a new way to increase nutrients use efficiency in crop production. International Journal of Agricultural Science 9:3831–3833.

Meng OF, Yue SC, Hou P, Cui ZL and Chen XP. 2016. Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously for maize and wheat in China: A review. Pedosphere 26: 137-147.

Mer M and Ama EHE. 2014. Effect of Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn foliar application on productivity and quality of some wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agricultural Food and Applied Science 2: 283-291.

Porpavai S, Devasenapathy P, Siddeswaran K and Jayaraj T. 2011. Impact of various rice- based cropping system on soil fertility. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds 2(3):43-46.

Raliya R, Saharan V, Dimkpa C and Biswas P. 2018.Nanofertilizer for precision and sustainable agriculture: Current state and future perspectives. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66: 6487-6503.

Reddya AR, Chaitanya KV and Vivekanand M. 2004. Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Jouranal of Plant Physiology 161: 1189-1202.

Sankadiya S and Sanodiya L. 2021. Effect of phosphorus and potassium levels on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal 10 (10): 1347-1350.

Sharar MS, Ayub M, Nadeem MA and Ahmad N. 2003. Effect of different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and grain yield of maize. Asian Plant Science 2(3): 347-349.

Sharma PP, Pandey G, Jawahar S, Kalaiyarasm C and Suseendran K. 2018. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Research and Analytical Review 5(4): 2349-5138.

Tarafdar JC, Sharma S and Raliya R.2013. Nanotechnology: Interdisciplinary science of applications. African Journal of Biotechnology 12(3):219-226.

Usama M and Khalid MA. 2018. Fertilizer consumption in India and need for its balanced use: A review. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection 38(7): 567-577.

Wang M, Zheng Q, Shen Q and Guo S. 2013. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International Journal of Molecular Science 14(4):7370-7390.

Wojnowska T, Panak H and Seikiewiez S. 1995. Reaction of winter oilseed rape to increasing levels of nitrogen fertilizer application under condition of Ketizyn Chernozem. Rosling Oleiste16:173-180.

Wu M. 2013. Effects of incorporation of nano-carbon into slow released fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen loss in surface water of paddy soil. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 5: 398-403.

Zain M, Khan I, Qadri RWK, Ashraf U, Hussain S,Minhas S, Siddique A, Jahangir M and Bashir M. 2015. Foliar application of micronutrients enhances wheat growth, yield and related attributes. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6:864-869.

Zulfiqar F, Navarro M, Ashraf M, AkramNA and Munné BS. 2019.Nano fertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: Advantages and limitations. Plant Science 289: 110270.

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.