Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Parameters in Response to Stress in Horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) Germplasm

Authors

  • Ankita Sharma Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • Rakesh Kumar Chahota Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062

Keywords:

<I>Macrotyloma uniflorum</I> L., Proline, MDA, Chlorophyll A, Chlorophyll B, Carotenoids, Drought Stress.

Abstract

Plants are continuously exposed to number of biotic and abiotic stresses during its life span. Amongst all, drought is one of the major abiotic stresses affecting the agricultural production worldwide. Horsegram (Macrotyoma uniflorum L.) is considered to be drought tolerant legume, which was chosen to compare the various biochemical parameters in response to drought stress. Plants of mapping population consisting of 86 germplasm lines were subjected to wilting under drought stress and compared with the plants of control for various biochemical parameters. The proline content was significantly higher in tolerant lines as compared to sensitive genotypes under drought stress. The maximum variation within the panel was observed for proline contents among all the five biochemical parameters used for estimation. The results suggested that higher levels of proline in horsegram lines could be used for identifying drought tolerant lines for the development of drought tolerant and high yielding varieties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-21

How to Cite

Sharma, A., & Chahota, R. K. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Parameters in Response to Stress in Horsegram (<i>Macrotyloma uniflorum</i> L.) Germplasm. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 47(2), 143–148. Retrieved from https://hjar.org/index.php/hjar/article/view/168984

Issue

Volume 47, Issue 2, December 2021

Section

Review Article

References

Anjum SA, Xie XY, Wang LC, Saleem MF, Man C and Lei W. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (9): 2026-2032.

Basal O and Szabo A. 2020. Physiomorphology of soybean as affected by drought stress and nitrogen application. Scientifica:1-7.

Bates LS, Waldren RP and Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39 (1): 205-207.

Bhardwaj J and Yadav SK. 2012. Comparative study on biochemical parameters and antioxidant enzymes in a drought tolerant and a sensitive variety of horsegram (Macrotyloma umiflorum) under drought stress. American Journal of Plant Physiology 7 (1): 17-29.

Chaudhary AK. 2013. Technological and extension yield gaps in pulse crops in Mandi district of Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 41 (1): 88-97.

Heath RL and Packer L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 125 (1): 189-198.

Lokeshwar RR. 1997. Handbook of Agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Mafakheri A, Siosamerdeh A, Bahramnejad B, Strick PC and Sohrabi E. 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4 (8):580585.

Praba ML, Cairns J.E, Babu RC and Lafitte HR. 2009. Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 195 (1): 30-46.

Reddy PCO, Sairanganayakulu G, Thippeswamy M, Reddy PS Reddy MK and Sudhakar C. 2008. Identification of stress induced genes from the drought tolerant semi-arid legume crop horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum Lam.) Verdc. through analysis of subtracted expressed sequence tags. Plant Science 175 (3): 372-384.

Rezaei MK, Deokar AA, Arganosa G, Roorkiwal M, Pandey SK, Warkentin TD, Varshney RK and Taran B. 2019. Mapping quantitative trait loci for carotenoid concentration in three F2 populations of chickpea. The Plant Genome 12 (3): 1-12.

Salma UK, Khatun F, Bhuiyan MJH, Yasmin S, Khan TH. 2016. In vitro screening for drought tolerance of some chickpea varieties in Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture 27 (2): 110-118.

Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Panneerselvam R and Shao MA. 2009. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the coenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Critical Reviews of Biotechnology 29 (2): 131-151.

Shinozaki K and Shinozaki KY. 2007. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 58 (2): 221-227.

Wang X, Lei XG and Wang J. 2014. Malondialdehyde regulates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in murine islets via TCF7L2-dependent Wnt signaling pathway. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 382 (1):8-16.

Yordanov I, Velikova V and Tsonev T. 2003. Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology (Special issue): 187-206.