Effect of Split Application of Nitrogen on Productivity, Profitability and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Dry Temperate Conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Authors

  • Janardan Singh Department of Agronomy, Forages and Grassland Management, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • D. R. Chaudhary Directorate of Extension Education, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya,Palampur-176 062

Keywords:

Nitrogen, Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Productivity, Profitability, Garden Pea.

Abstract

A field experiment comprising of six treatments viz. N0 (control), N20 (20 kg N/ha as basal), N40 (40 kg N/ha as basal), N20+20 (40 kg N/ha in two equal splits, half as basal and another half as top-dressing at 30 DAS), N60 (60 kg N/ha as basal) and N30+30 (60 kg N/ha in two equal splits) was conducted at Highland Agricultural Research and Extension Centre, Kukumseri during summer 2013 to study the effect of split application of nitrogen on growth, yield, economics and nitrogen use efficiency in garden pea. N at 60 kg/ha in splits gave taller plants while the shorter plants were under control. Basal application of 40 kg N/ha proved to be the best treatment for increasing productivity and profitability of garden pea in cold desert region of Himachal Pradesh. The highest dry matter production (5166 kg/ha) was recorded at N40. Maximum dry matter efficiency (0.83%/day), unit area efficiency (4.31g/m2/day), green pod weight (4.3g/pod) and productivity (43.13 kg/ha/day) were recorded at N40. The highest green pod yield (3666 kg/ha) was at N40 which was 120 and 62.9% higher over N0 and N20, respectively. Maximum nitrogen use efficiency (50 kg green pod/kg N), gross returns (99150/ha), net returns (62859/ha), B:C ratio (2.73) and profitability (Rs. 740/ha/day) were also at N40. There was no benefit of using N in splits in pea in this drier tract of the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

Singh, J., & Chaudhary, D. R. (2016). Effect of Split Application of Nitrogen on Productivity, Profitability and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Garden Pea (<I>Pisum sativum</I> L.) under Dry Temperate Conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 42(1), 87–90. Retrieved from https://hjar.org/index.php/hjar/article/view/109832

Issue

Section

Short Note

References

Achakzai AKK and Bangulzai MI. 2006. Effect of various levels of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and yield attributes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38(2): 331-340.

Achakzai AKK and Kayani SA. 2004. Effect of fertilizer and inoculation on the growth and yield of soybean cv.Williams-82 in pot culture. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research18 (1): 83-93.

Achakzai AKK. 2012. Effect of various levels of nitrogen fertilizer on some vegetative growth attributes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44 (2): 655-659.

Ali S, Ghaffoor A, Jilani MS and Waseem K 2001. Effect of different nitrogen levels on the growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 4 (5): 551-553.

Anonymous. 2012. Status Report on Cold Arid areas of Himachal Pradesh. Directorate of Research, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, pp 54.

Baloch AF. 1994. Vegetable Crops. In: Horticulture, (Eds. Bashir E and Bantel R.). National Book Foundation, Islamabad. Pakistan pp 525-526.

Chadha S, Rana SS, Rameshwar and Sood P. 2004. Weed control and fertility scheduling in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 30 (1): 23-32.

Fisher RA and Yates F. 1949. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research 8: 112.

Gul NI, Jilani MS and Wasim K. 2006. Effect of split application of nitrogen levels on the quality and quality parameters of pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8 (2): 226-230.

Kakar AA, Saleem M, Shah R and Shah SAQ. 2002. Growth and marketable green pod yield performance of pea (Pisum satium L.) under varying levels of NPK fertilizers. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1 (5): 532-534.

Kumar A, Manuja S, Singh J, Chaudhary DR and Sharma SK. 2015. Intensification of cropping through introduction of second crop after peas in Lahaul valley of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41(2): 122-125.

Panse VG and Sukhatme PV. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi pp381.

Pochauri DC, Takur PC and Verma TS. 1991. Effect of different levels of NPK on seed yield of peas. Progressive Horticulture 20 (1-2): 58-62.

Saimbhi MS and Grewal AS. 1986. Effect of source of N and levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of pea. Punjab Vegetable Grower 21:10-15.

Singh J and Chaudhary DR. 2016. Productivity and profitability of frenchbean as influenced by nutrient management in cold desert region of North-western Himalaya. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61(1): 53-57.

Singh J, Chaudhary DR and Kumar S. 2015. Effect of post emergence herbicides on productivity and profitability of garden pea in Lahaul valley of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41(2): 172-176.

Subhan F. 1991. Effect of time of nitrogen application on growth and yield of peas. Bulletin Penelitian Horticulture 17 (3): 91-95.

Verma VS and Saxena KK. 1995. Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to graded dose of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in silty soil of central Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40 (1): 67-71.

Yadav LM, Sharma PB and Maurya KR. 1996. Effect of N and P on growth and yield of some varieties of peas. Madras Agriculture Journal 83 (3): 142-147.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.