Effect of Different Farming Practices on Productivity, Profitability and Produce Quality of Black Gram-Garden Pea Cropping Sequence
Keywords:
Productivity, Profitability, Quality, Garden Pea, Black Gram.Abstract
Continuous and imbalanced use of costly chemical fertilizers as a source of nutrients in mid hill farming systems has led to decreased nutrient use efficiency which results in either yield stagnation or decrease in yield. Alternative low-input farming practices have emerged in pockets across the world promising reduced input costs and higher yields for farmers, chemical-free food for consumers and improved soil fertility. The present study was carried out during 2018-19 and 2019-20 on black gram-garden pea cropping system, wherein eight different farming practices were evaluated in RBD. The results revealed significantly higher grain and straw yield, and quality of produce with recommended NPK+FYM (soil test based fertilizer application) over other farming practices. The economic analysis of black gram and garden pea showed that, though the highest net returns were obtained from treatment wherein 50% NPK + 50% FYM (integrated) was applied, however, highest benefit cost ratio was recorded in treatment sole application of NPK in both the crops during both years of study.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Anonymous. 2018. Indian Horticulture Database, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India New Delhi.
Dey B, Singh MK, De C, Singh VK and De N. 2012. Integrated nutrient management on economics and energy utilization in vegetable pea production. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 3 (2):152-157.
Dhulgande GS, Dhale DA, Pachkore GL and Satpute RA. 2011. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Experimental Science 2: 7-8.
FAO. 2003. FAO Food and Nutrition paper 77. Food energy- Methods of analysis and conversion factors. http://www.fao.org/3/y5022e/y5022e03.htm#bm3.1 (22 Feb, 2019).
Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Gopinath KA, Supradip S, Mina BL, Pande H, Kumar N, Srivastva AK and Gupta HS. 2009. Yield potential of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties, and soil properties underorganic and integrated nutrient management systems. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 55 (2):157–167.
Koshalendra T, Solankey BS and Shinde DA.1992. Effect of phosphorus levels and genotypes on quality of soybean seeds. Legume Research 15 (2): 76-80.
Kumar S, Sharma MK, Chandra A and Sharma BD. 2012. Yield and quality of pea (Pisum Sativum L.) as affected by levels of Zn and FYM. Asian Journal of Horticulture 7 (1):104-107.
Sharma RP and Rana DS. 1993. Nutrient management in vegetable crops for sustainable production. Fertilizer News 38 (7): 31-34.
Sharma V, Gupta A, Khalsa GS and Sharma R. 2011.Direct and residual effect of integrated nutrient management on garden pea (Pisum sativum) based crop sequence in Lahaul valley of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 56 (4): 351-355.
Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD and Haulin JL. 1995. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.
Tiwari KN. 2002. Nutrient management for sustainable agriculture. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 50:374-397.
Tyagi PK and Singh VK. 2019 Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and nutrients uptake of summer blackgram. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 21(1): 30-35.
Verma SN, Sharma N and Verma A. 2017. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, quality and yield of soybean (Glycine max). Annals of Plant and Soil Research 19 (4): 372-376.