Evaluation of Different Components of Natural Farming in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.) Under Mid Hill Conditionsof Himachal Pradesh

Authors

  • Nasratullah Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • Rameshwar Kumar Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • Sandeep Manuja Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • Raj Paul Sharma Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • G. D. Sharma Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062
  • Subhash Verma Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN COVAS, CSK HPKV, Palampur

Keywords:

Black Gram, <i>Jeevamrit</i>, Ghanjeevamrit, Mulching and Natural Farming.

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during kharif 2019 and 2020 at Holta Zero Budget Natural Farm (ZBNF), Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different components of natural farming on crop production and economics of black gram. The results revealed that yield attributes and yield (seed and straw) of black gram increased significantly with application of natural farming components in totality. Application of ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit + mulching (T7) significantly increased the seed yield of black gram over T8 (absolute control) by 61.4 and 233.1 per cent during 2019 and 2020, respectively and application of ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit (T4) recorded significantly higher net returns of Rs. 49265 ha-1 statistically at par with ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit + mulching (T4) in 2019. However, in 2020, application of ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit + mulching (T7) recorded higher net returns of Rs. 64206 ha over other treatments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-21

How to Cite

Nasratullah, Kumar, R., Manuja, S., Sharma, R. P., Sharma, G. D., & Verma, S. (2022). Evaluation of Different Components of Natural Farming in Black Gram (<I>Vigna mungo</i> L.) Under Mid Hill Conditionsof Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 47(2), 175–179. Retrieved from https://hjar.org/index.php/hjar/article/view/168988

Issue

Volume 47, Issue 2, December 2021

Section

Review Article

References

Anonymous. 2018. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi.

Gomez GA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research (2nd Ed.). John Wiley and sons, New York. p 680.

Kasbe SS, Joshi M and Bhaskar S. 2009. Characterization of farmer’s jeevamrit formulations with respect to aerobic rice. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 43 (3): 570-573.

Palekar S. 2006. Shoonya Bandovalada Naisargika Krushi. Swamy Anand, Agri Prakashana, Bengaluru, India.

Siddappa. 2015. Use of jeevamrit and farm yard manure on growth and yield of field bean (Lablab purpureus var. lignosus). M Sc Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

Sutar R, Sujith GM and Devakumar N. 2018. Growth and yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) as influenced by jeevamrit and panchagavya application. Legume Research 3932: 1-5.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.