Genetic Diversity of Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum Tataricum Gaertn.) Genotypes Based on Cluster And Principal Component Analyses in Organic Agriculture

Authors

  • Vivek Singh Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding; Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur- 176062 (HP)
  • Vinod Kumar Sood Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding; Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur- 176062 (HP)
  • Rhitisha Sood Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding; Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur- 176062 (HP)
  • Shailja Sharma Mountain Agriculture Research and Extension Centre, Sangla, Kinnaur, H.P
  • Vivek Singh Department of Vegetable Science & Floriculture. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur- 176062 (HP)
  • G. Katna Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming .Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur- 176062 (HP)

Keywords:

<i>Fagopyrum</i>, variation, multivariateanalysis, micronutrients.

Abstract

A total of 24 accessions of tartary buckwheat with some local germplasm were analyzed by cluster and principal component using 17 quantitative characters to group them on the similarity at phenotypic level, and to identify the most relevant characters in explaining the variation. The genotypic variance of all the traits was lower than the phenotypic variance. Highest GCV and PCV were recorded for seed yield per plant, seed per plant and protein content. The non-hierarchical Euclidean cluster analysis using Mahalanobis statistic, grouped the genotypes into five distinct clusters among which two clusters were polygenotypic and three clusters were monogenotypic. Cluster I was the largest group comprising of 15 genotypes characterized with highest primary branch per plant, inflorescence length, leaf per plant, seed per plant, seed yield per plant, magnesium content, iron content and zinc content. Most of the high yielding germplasm along with Himpriya were grouped under this cluster. Cluster II composed of the genotypes having high amount of protein, calcium and phosphorus that can be used as a source for introgression of genes responsible for high nutrition. The results of PCA confirmed the findings of cluster analysis. Six principal components having eigen value greater than one, accounted for nearly 78.58% of the total variation. According to eigen vector analysis, the observed variation for first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth principal component were about 26%, 15%, 12%, 10%, 8% and 6%, respectively. In the first principal component, number of seed per plant and seed yield per plant were the most contributing traits whereas days to maturity, calcium and iron were the principal traits of the second principal component.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Singh, V., Sood, V. K., Sood, R., Sharma, S., Singh, V., & Katna, G. (2024). Genetic Diversity of Tartary Buckwheat (<i>Fagopyrum Tataricum Gaertn</i>.) Genotypes Based on Cluster And Principal Component Analyses in Organic Agriculture. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 50(1), 29–37. Retrieved from https://hjar.org/index.php/hjar/article/view/172542

Issue

Section

Full Length Papers

References

Bhardwaj N and Kaur J 2020. Strategies for in situ conservation and cultivation of buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.) -A potential pseudocereal of North Western Himalayas. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 46 (1): 13-21.

Bisht AS, Bhatt A and Singh P 2018. Studies on variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for seed yield in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) germplasm. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 5: 35-39.

Campbell C 1995. Inter-specific hybridization in the genus Fagopyrum. In: Proc. 6th International Symposium on Buckwheat. Ina, Japan. Pp. 255-263.

Campbell CG 2003. Buckwheat Crop Improvement. Fagopyrum 20:1-6.

Chauhan A and Sharma A 2021. Genetic diversity in edible podded pea (Pisum sativum var. saccharatum). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 34 (2): 301-304

Deng LQ, Zhang Q, Hang KF and Chen QF 2011. RAPD analysis for genetic diversity of nineteen common and tartary buckwheat varieties. Agriculture Science and Technology 12: 65-69

Deshmukh SN, Basu MS and Reddy PS 1986. Genetic variability, character association and path analysis of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science 56: 816-821.

Fehr WR 1987. Heritability. Principles of cultivar development, 1, pp 95–105.

Genebank Standards. 1994. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

Hamdi A, El-Ghareib AA, Shafey SA and Ibrahim MAM 2003. Genetic variability, heritability, and expected genetic advance for earliness and seed yield from selection in lentil. Egypt Journal of Agriculture Research 81: 125-137.

Hammer O, Harper DAT and Ryan PD 2001 PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1-9.

Hiremath G, Desai SA, Lavanya V, Patel NB, Satisha TN, Biradar S and Naik VR 2017. Genetic variability analysis in germplasm collections of buckwheat. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6: 604-710

Johnson HW, Robinson HF and Comstock RE 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 47: 314-318.

Joshi BD and Rana JC 1997. Genetic divergence in buckwheat. Indian Journal of Agriculture Sciences 67: 30-32.

Joshi BK 2005. Correlation, regression and path coefficient analyses for some yield components in common and tartary buckwheat in Nepal. Fagopyrum 22: 77-82

Mahalanobis PC 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceeding of National Institute of Sciences,India (B) 2: 49-55.

Rana P, Basandrai D, Sood VK and Rana A 2023. Studies on genetic variability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under multiple environments in Northern western Himalayas. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 49 (2): 155-162.

Rana JC and Sharma BD 2000. Variation, genetic divergence and interrelationship analysis in buckwheat. Fagopyrum 17: 9-14.

Rana N, Sharma A, Rana RS, Lata H, Bansuli, Thakur A, Singh V and Sood A 2023. Morphological and molecular diversity in mid-late and late maturity genotypes of cauliflower. PLoS ONE 18(8): e0290495.

Rao CR 1952. Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York. p 45-110.

Sekhon BS, Sharma A, Katoch V, Kapila RK and Sood VK 2019. Assessment of genetic diversity in advanced breeding lines derived from intraspecific crosses of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research 42(2): 145-152

Sharma A, Sharma S, Kumar N, Rana RS, Sharma P, Kumar P and Rani M 2022. Morpho-molecular genetic diversity and population structure analysis in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes using simple sequence repeat markers. PLoS ONE 17(9): e0273499.

Sharma A, Sekhon BS, Sharma S and Kumar R 2020. Newly isolated intervarietal garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) progenies (F ) under north western Himalayan 7 conditions of India. Experimental Agriculture 56 (1): 76- 87

Singh V, Thakur C, Sanu K and Katna G 2024. Buckwheat: Rediscovering the forgotten super food. In: Millets a strive towards a sustainable future, eds Singh V, Sood R, Sanu K, Katna G, Singh IP and Reddy UG. Publish my work, New Delhi, India, pp 202-20.

Soharu A, Mittal RK, Sood VK and Kaur N 2022. Morphological characterization and evaluation of Himalayan landraces of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.)) from North-Western plain zone for yield and its component traits. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 48 (2): 157-165.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.